Open Letter to the governments of the world.
United Earth Confederation (UEC)
November 01, 2021
Dear governments of the world:
We respectfully submit this open letter to express our most sincere concerns and resolute stand against the forced coercive medical vacination intervention of world citicens, and against the undue discrimination experienced by those exercising their lawful right to bodily autonomy. As citizens of the world, we cannot in good conscience willingly endorse and support that which we believe goes against the best interests of the people of the world.
SUMMARY
As world citizens, our universal rights and constitutionally-protected freedoms precede the world governments, and may only be temporarily limited if the majority of evidence justifies such infringements as reasonable, provable, and guided by laws. If presented with all available evidence in a court, we firmly believe that the current governments of the world implementing covid mandates do not hold up under scrutiny.
As the United Earth Confederation, we look past what information is provided and focus on how the information is presented. A proper investigation should be conducted as objectively as possible, and follow the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete world investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case, even contradictory evidence. Why, then, is there little to no tolerance for free and open world debate on this matter? Many credible world medical and scientific experts are being censored. Accordingly, we rightly have concerns about "the science" we are being coerced to "follow".
As representatives of world communities, we have never witnessed such division on our planet. This sense of "Us versus Them" will be further fueled by having citizens consisting only of "vaccinated" people and "unvaccinated" people, which goes against world unity that is what we strived to achieve.
Due to the Covid, we already face higher levels of stress and mental illnesses due to the confinements, masks, restrictions and coerce vaccination. These have been compounded - considerably - by world government actions that we believe are deeply unethical, threatening livelihoods, and dividing societies.
As citizens of the world we question the legitimacy of many world governments, what is being done to mitigate this stress? Moreover, what assurances are we given that the injections will not cause short or long-term side effects? What steps will be taken to ensure all world citizens are compensated for adverse side effects?
World governments are expected to preserve the peace, uphold the law, and defend the public interest. The UEC strongly believes that forced and coerced medical treatments undermine all three and, thus, contradict world government duties and responsibilities to all world citizens. The UEC remains loyal to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and asks you to send investigators to collect statements from world medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who allege they have been silenced - putting lives at risk. Allow us to make this information publicly available to all so the world public can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent.
ABOUT US
This letter was created from the collective thoughts, beliefs, and opinions of actively serving members of the united earth confederation(UEC) from across the world. We have a wealth of experience and we come from various ranks, levels of experience, communities, cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs, and vaccination statuses. Together we are the united earth confederation(UEC). We are individuals who are united in the belief that all world citizens should not be forced and coerced into taking a medical intervention.
OUR STANCE
In the past year, world governments one after the other have announced, "All world citizens need to be fully vaccinated," and that for those without a medical exemption who choose not to be vaccinated: "There will be consequences"1.
Since many world government statements, many workers and employees have been told they will be sent home without pay for refusing to receive a contested medical treatment. We have united in the belief that world people should not be forced or coerced into receiving the current COVID-19 treatments - it should be voluntary. the confederatie stands united against the forced and coerced medical intervention of world citicenz and against the discrimination faced by those who have exercised their right to bodily autonomy. We believe in democracy, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
This is not about whether people should be vaccinated - that is a personal choice.
THE LAWs
The primary duty of world governments should be in the preservation of peace. We have never witnessed the level of division in the world as we currently see from the COVID-19 pandemic. It is the responsibility of world governments, now more than ever, to make all efforts at preserving the peace in their countries.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights protects fundamental rights and freedoms essential to keeping world citizens in a free and democratic society. The UEC believes that world nations should be founded upon principles that acknowledge ... the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free humans and free institutions. We also affirm that humans and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law.
We believe that our world governments have failed to uphold their Constitutions, the Universal declaration of Human Rights and we are witnessing the erosion of democracy in the world. As you know, no country guarantees absolute freedoms. If the governments are going to limit freedoms, they must establish the limitations are reasonable given all available facts. The governments of the world must adhere to a process to prove their actions are appropriate. We firmly believe, if presented with all available evidence in a court, all world governments implementing covid mandates would not pass in their courts.
Requiring mandatory COVID-19 treatment options is a slippery slope and allows world governments to overstep their authority unchecked. It infringes on the fundamental belief that world human individuals have the right and freedom to choose. The choice of whether to receive medical treatments has always been an individual's right in the world. Immunization can not be mandatory in the world; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Universal declaration of Human Rights that guarantees these fundamental freedoms and the freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression. Without individuals having the freedom to choose, we would not have any form of world democratic societies.
Though the Nuremberg Code is not a law, it is internationally accepted and falls in line with the spirit of the Universal declaration of Human Rights. A key component of the Nuremberg Code is that participants in a medical experiment need to participate voluntarily without any form of force or coercion. The UEC has documentation from several doctors who have explained the current COVID-19 treatment options, being referred to as vaccines, were recently authorized as new drugs despite the absence of long-term data. According to these accredited doctors, these treatment options did not meet the criteria of true vaccines until very recently when the definition of vaccine was changed. Without long-term data, these vaccines are still experimental. We believe the act of removing the rights and freedoms of world citizens who refuse to participate in specific COVID-19 treatment options is a form of coercion.
Many world Criminal Codes contain the country's Criminal Offences and explain in many similar ways that a person commits an assault by intentionally applying force to someone else without that person's consent. All world Criminal Codes further similarly explains that consent is not obtained from a person who submits, or neglects to resist, on the grounds of authority being exercised over them. How then can someone give proper consent to a COVID-19 treatment injection when doing so under the threat of losing their job, freedoms, or livelihood? Many world courts have already ruled that medical treatment without proper informed consent is an assault.
As world governments and their enforcers ( Law enforcement, military, government workers, medical workers etc) they should not in good conscience willingly participate in enforcing mandates that violate the laws of their country and breach the rights and freedoms of the people they serve and protect.
LEST WE FORGET
Each year, on the 11th of November, around the world we remember those who sacrificed their lives for our freedoms. From Flanders Field to Juno Beach, many World citizens have bled and died fighting tyrannical nations. We need to remember past events to prevent the repetition of history's greatest mistakes.
There was a time when scientists believed humans were divided into racial hierarchies and that a person's intelligence level and characteristics were determined by race. These beliefs were not heavily contested and were widely accepted as scientific fact. Phrenology was also widely accepted as being a legitimate scientific study. These are not examples of science being wrong but of people conducting poor investigations or misunderstanding their findings. These are just two of several historical examples of widely accepted scientific truths, which became ridiculed practices.
We look back at those times of racial hierarchy and wonder how something so wrong could have been so widely accepted as truth. It is just as hard to conceptualize how so many humans through time could have blindly followed lawful orders that devastated so many lives. Yet now we find ourselves in dangerous waters, when world citizens are being forced under coercion and duress to participate in actions they believe go against the spirit of their countries laws.
The UEC finds it ironic that an organization like the UN that preaches the honour and respect of the Universal declaration of Human Rights values, would support actions that contradict the values all world citizens fought to uphold. Enforcement of identification and checkpoints was an early step in what would become the Holocaust. World citizens of various backgrounds are being segregated and punished for choosing not to disclose a personal medical decision. We cannot think of a more ironic and cruel way for our world governments to pay homage to the sacrifices citizens have made worldwide to protect individual freedoms than by participating in a process that takes those freedoms away.
Today, instead of having one version of scientific "truth" during this pandemic, we have versions that contradict one another. How can some professionals be so certain their interpretation of science is correct when others give evidence to the contrary? History has already demonstrated we get things wrong even when our scientists agree.
We acknowledge there is a spectrum filled with beliefs relating to this pandemic. For the sake of simplicity, we will refer to two main schools of thought: the common narrative (those who believe the current COVID-19 treatment injections are the way through the pandemic) and those who have concerns with the COVID-19 treatment injections. It's important to note we are not discussing "antivaxxers" in this letter. We are discussing people with various vaccination statuses who pose questions about the current COVID-19 treatment options being forced upon them.
THE SCIENCE
UEC members are not scientists nor healthcare professionals. We do not pretend to be experts in medical or scientific fields, but we ask the world governments to look for the facts. Proper investigations follow simple practices that remain consistent across most fields. These practices include but are not limited to: asking the right questions, following evidence, being aware of how biases may affect results, and allowing the evidence to point to the conclusion - not allowing the conclusion to point to the evidence. Most importantly, proper world investigations should be conducted as objectively as possible and follow the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete world investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case, even contradictory evidence.
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused several scientists and medical professionals to provide us with information they described as "science", "scientific", or "facts". The problem with many of these statements is that the provided information often contradicted another piece of "scientific fact" that an equally qualified professional had produced. This makes it near impossible for the average person to know what to believe and what not to believe.
The UEC asks that world governments look past what information is provided and focus on how the information is presented. This will allow them some insight into the credibility of the world's information. Some professionals make definitive statements such as "It's safe and effective" or "This is the way", giving little or no explanation of how they reached their conclusion. When the information provided is challenged or questioned, the response often indicates the answer is something that cannot be questioned. The CDC recently changed its definition of immunity and vaccine,, allowing the current COVID-19 treatment injections to fit the definition. This is an example of actions taken when you allow your conclusion to point to your evidence.
Other qualified world professionals have provided alternate pieces of information during this pandemic. It is not what their results were, but how they arrived at their results that we believe in. These professionals have all been able to articulate their findings quite well and are quick to admit the remaining questions they cannot answer. These world professionals have expressed warnings and concerns with the current COVID-19 treatment options condoned by the world governments. Some of these concerns suggest a higher-than-average number of moderate to severe side-effects from the COVID-19 "vaccinations' ' compared with our traditional vaccinations. Others have stated the current COVID-19 treatment options are proving to be less effective than initially believed.
We have attached several documents as appendices to this letter which contain information we believe raises reasonable concerns with the current COVID-19 vaccination mandates seen across the world. The UEC encourages you to review the documents and the work each document references thoroughly. Though we understand we have provided a lot of material - which will take time and resources to read - we believe the fact that there is so much evidence opposing the mandatory roll-out of the current COVID-19 treatments is reason enough to take our concerns seriously.
There have also been scientific papers that suggest natural immunity is a better form of protection than what the COVID-19 vaccination can give. Why is antibody testing not being discussed as a potential option for world citizens?
Here is a list of the documents we've attached to this letter. These documents are a sample of what is available and were written by people (or groups) of scientific or medical professionals in fields directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We defer to their expertise.
Appendix A - This is an open letter from Dr. Eric Payne, a pediatric neurologist in Alberta, to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. In his letter, Dr. Payne highlights several inconsistencies he has found with the common narrative. Dr. Payne provides several sources from around the world throughout his letter.
Appendix B - This is the Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration. This heavily sourced document provides information on the current pandemic and makes recommendations based on their findings.
Appendix C - This is a letter from Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist in Ontario, to the President of the University of Guelph. Dr. Bridle uses his extensive experience and qualifications to explain his concerns with the common narrative surrounding the COVID-19 treatment injections. Dr. Bridle also articulates his concerns with the COVID-19 health mandates.
Appendix D - This is an open letter from Health Professionals United to the Alberta Health Services. The letter outlines reasons why several frontline healthcare workers in Alberta heavily oppose mandatory COVID-19 vaccination mandates.
Appendix E - This is an open letter from frontline healthcare workers in British Columbia to Dr. Bonnie Henry, Adrian Dix, and Premier John Horgan. The author(s) state their experiences and expertise are being ignored and ask that the vaccination mandates be revoked.
Appendix F - This is a report from Dr. Tess Lawrie from the United Kingdom. Dr. Lawrie demonstrates the abnormal number of reported adverse effects from the current COVID-19 treatment injections.
Appendix G - This is a comprehensive report comparing natural immunity to COVID-19 vs Vaccine-Induced Immunity. It was comprised from several scientists from Ontario and British Columbia.
CENSORSHIP
As the United Earth Confederation we are representing the people of the world during this pandemic. The UEC wants to participate in a way to support the physical and mental well-being of all world humans. We believe it is essential for world citizens to participate with full informed consent by understanding all the risks of what they are being asked (or in this case forced) to participate in.
The United Earth Confederation is accustomed to seeing the media portraying negatively or misrepresenting the outcome of incidents. It would be little to no surprise for us to hear that a media agency misreported an incident. However, it was surprising for us to learn that several of these scientists and doctors, who questioned the information fueling the COVID-19 treatment mandates, also spoke of censorship.
The UEC believes it is the media's responsibility to present all available facts to the public . It is not their place to decide what the outcome of an investigation should be. The world media's job is to collect all available facts so that the world citizens can make an informed decision. Have the world media not learned from past mistakes, that presenting evidence that only supports one side, while ignoring or refusing to acknowledge evidence from another side, is wrong and tarnishes the credibility of all informed consent. How can the world media provide evidence from witnesses who agree on one story while ignoring or hiding the witnesses who agree on a different account of an incident.
It would be unthinkable that the world media would blatantly disregard witnesses in an investigation to mislead world citizens. The information given would lose all integrity and the world journalist would be criticized. Why then are we allowing this same behaviour to occur by other public figures? There are accredited medical professionals from our own countries who are desperately trying to have their findings heard. Instead of allowing these professionals to speak freely and discuss their results publicly, they are being silenced by governing bodies.
The UEC sees that it is crucial that these world professionals be allowed to speak openly and publicly. Without the information being included in discussions, we believe the citizens of the world are not receiving the information they need to make an informed decision. This is contrary to world laws and beliefs, and we do not support it.
These world medical professionals have tried to stand up and support their countries. The United Earth Confederation is now standing up and supporting them. They must be allowed to share their information publicly to maintain people's faith in their governments. If the people believe governments are continuing to censor experts, The world countries will fall into instability. This is also common around the world in countries whose tyrannical governments sensor information from their people.
DISCRIMINATION
We strongly oppose the discrimination that has already begun to create segregation in all countries. It has divided families, ended friendships, torn apart spouses, and entered all public world workplaces. We believe the current messaging being put out by our governments is promoting the creation of an in-group referred to as "Vaccinated" and an out-group as "Unvaccinated". Even worse, the out-group has been labelled "Anti-vaxxers," a term used out of context in a negative and derogatory way. The messaging from our governments is causing the dehumanization of the "Unvaccinated" group. By dehumanizing the out-group, an institution creates a greater divide between them and the in-group. The UEC anticipates that unless this is corrected soon, it will continue to increase the divide in the world.
Dehumanizing individuals is challenging. It is easier to attach a label and stigma to a group. That way, anyone or anything that comes from the group can be written off. The world term "Anti-vaxxer" is currently being used to mislabel and group people into a category to take away their credibility. This has allowed things to be written and said against this group that would be intolerable if written or said about any other group.
The media around the world, on many occasions have written quotations like this one "I have no empathy left for the wilfully unvaccinated. Let them die. I honestly don't care if they die from COVID. Not even a little bit. Unvaccinated patients do not deserve ICU beds. At this point, who cares. Stick the unvaccinated in a tent outside and tend to them when the staff has time" If "willfully unvaccinated" was replaced with "Black", "Gay", or "willfully Muslim", this would have been labelled a Hate Crime. How then can we allow such things to be said and published about people who choose not to receive a medical intervention? Should we allow the same messaging for those who choose not to get a flu shot one season?
The boldness of these statements being printed in major world newspapers shows how acceptable it is in our society to treat people as a lower class of citizens. As RCMP members, we must preserve peace in our communities and put a stop to this.
PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH
This world pandemic has increasingly made people feel isolated from their friends, families, and peers. The recent world vaccination update has left some people feeling more isolated than ever. In times like this, people need support from a community. The UEC fears there are more world citizens afraid to speak up about these recent updates for fear of being targeted. Many world citizens may be trying to stick this out on their own, or worse, suffering in silence.
The UEC asks that all world governments attempt to reach out in good spirit to their citizens who may be negatively affected by these mandates and let them know their employers and governments support them.
Though few people seem to have little to no side effects from the COVID-19 treatment injections, an abnormal number of moderate to severe adverse reactions have included death. What assurances are world citizens given that the injections will not cause short or long-term side effects? Studies show that stress and sleep can play a huge factor in whether a vaccine is effective or not. Are you ensuring world citizens are provided with the appropriate amount of rest before an injection? What steps are the world governments taking to make sure world citizens are compensated for adverse side effects?
The UEC also believes enough evidence has been presented to question whether world government actions in this pandemic are the most appropriate. This is causing moral and ethical stressors for world citizens as they no longer believe their country is reflective of the democracy it claims to be. Mental health and stress levels will have a negative impact with world citizens.
PUBLIC INTERESTs
Lastly, the UEC wants to draw attention to the world public safety issues that will arise if these COVID-19 mandates are upheld.
A former leader once said, "There's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation." How is it our governments are saying it will be mandatory for employees working from home to receive the COVID-19 treatment injections?
Regardless of their vaccination statuses, there are world citizens who feel the steps taken by world governments are too extreme and do not have the best interest of their citizens. Forcing these mandates will cause world citizens to lose faith in their government's commitment to their universal rights. These world citizens will not be collaborators and will not participate in actions they believe contradict their morals, ethics, and their country laws. These world citizens believe it is their responsibility to challenge their governments and the UEC supports and represents them.
Many enterprises and public works spaces in the world are understaffed, and over time there will be additional gaps to fill across the world when these citizens are not working. Communities will have lost healthy and experienced citizens, causing a decrease in available resources. There will also be an increase in taxpayers' spending as world governments and enterprises attempt to fill these gaps. Being short-staffed will have a trickle-down effect causing fewer bodies to be available to properly recruit, assess, and conduct adequate recruitment on potential workers.
The UEC sees how crucial it is that professionals and all world citizens be allowed to speak openly and publicly. Without including their information in discussions, we believe that all world citizens are not receiving the information they need to make informed decisions. This is contrary to the universal charter, laws and beliefs, and we do not support it.
We want to reiterate a point stated earlier in this letter, so it is remembered. If the people believe their governments are continuing to censor experts, the countries will fall into instability. We are losing faith in the motives of our world governments, and the UEC will not tolerate anymore actions against the world citizens whose universal rights and freedoms are being violated.
CALL TO ACTION
If world governements continue down this road of segregation and discrimination, we risk repeating past mistakes. The divide in our societies is quickly leaning toward a level of national security. We ask that world governments open investigations to ensure no criminal acts were committed in the dissemination of information from all health authorities or public figures in positions of trust. We ask them to send investigators to collect statements from all medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who allege they had been silenced - putting lives at risk. Allow the UEC to make this information publicly available to all so that world citizens can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent. The UEC reminds us that a large-scale cross-world investigation must be transparent to regain trust in our world democratic process.